<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jon's Blog &#187; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opalfruits.net/blog/index.php/tag/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opalfruits.net/blog</link>
	<description>Philosophy, economics, politics, programming and funny videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:13:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The End Might Be Nigh &#8211; read the risk assessment</title>
		<link>http://opalfruits.net/blog/index.php/2008/09/08/the-end-might-be-nigh-read-the-risk-assessment/</link>
		<comments>http://opalfruits.net/blog/index.php/2008/09/08/the-end-might-be-nigh-read-the-risk-assessment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opalfruits.net/blog/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Large Hadron Collider (the latest particle accelerator at CERN) will be switched on this Wednesday and might destroy the world (read the full risk assessment here or a summary here). If it doesn&#8217;t, I wonder whether we&#8217;ll feel the UK&#8217;s £500m investment was worth it. In the 90s particle physicists were racing to detect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Large Hadron Collider (the latest particle accelerator at CERN) will be switched on this Wednesday and might destroy the world (<a href="http://lsag.web.cern.ch/lsag/LSAG-Report.pdf" target="_blank">read the full risk assessment here</a> or a summary <a href="http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html" target="_blank">here</a>). If it doesn&#8217;t, I wonder whether we&#8217;ll feel the UK&#8217;s £500m investment was worth it.</p>
<p>In the 90s particle physicists were racing to detect the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_quark" target="_blank">top quark</a> so that we could confirm that part of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model" target="_blank">our current best model of small things</a>. They were successful in 1995 and won themselves a Nobel prize but apart from that I can&#8217;t name any real benefit to humanity that has come from proving that the top quark does indeed exist. I&#8217;m all for trying to understand why our universe is the way it is but I can&#8217;t help feeling the money could be better spent.</p>
<p>Then again, the US military&#8217;s budget for 2007 was about £220 billion (that&#8217;s over £400,000 a minute, by the way) so maybe spending £500m on doing some (possibly) harmless science isn&#8217;t so bad.</p>
<p>Also in today&#8217;s news: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7600005.stm" target="_blank">Save the world, eat less cow</a> &#8211; UN figures suggest that meat production puts more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than transport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://opalfruits.net/blog/index.php/2008/09/08/the-end-might-be-nigh-read-the-risk-assessment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

